77.7%
Overall Utilization
Target: 80%▲ 2.4%
96.1%
Equipment Availability
Target: 95%▲ 1.2%
67.2%
OEE Score
Target: 85%▼ 0.8%
0.00M
Monthly Capacity (Wafers)
+5.6% YoY▲
0.62 hrs
Avg Cycle Time
Target: 1.5 hrs▲ 0.02
90.0%
Overall Yield
Target: 88%▲ 0.5%
🎮 Scenario Simulation
📋 Current Status
Equipment Qty:
42 units
Assigned Shift:
Various
Hrs/Week:
94 hrs/wk
100% Max Equip:
16,864 hrs/mo
80% Max Op:
13,490 hrs/mo
Current Util:
62%
Active Scenarios
No scenarios added. Add scenarios above to simulate capacity changes.
📐 Capacity Equations & Bottleneck Analysis
Maximum Equipment Capacity (100%)
Cap = Hrs/Wk × Qty × 4.16667
= 1,248 hrs/month
Maximum Operational Capacity (80%)
Op Cap = 0.8 × Max Equip Cap
= 998 hrs/month
OEE (Overall Equipment Effectiveness)
OEE = Avail% × Util% × Yield%
= 67.2%
Bottleneck Utilization
BN = (Demand Hrs / Max Op Cap) × 100
= Flight Control @ 101%
📊 Total Manufacturing Hours - Airframe Assembly Station✓ Baseline
Stacked by Program | 🔴 Baseline Capacity | 🟢 Simulated Capacity | 🔵 80% Simulated Target
🚨 Bottleneck by Equipment (Utilization %)
Sorted by utilization - dotted lines show thresholds
🚨 Bottleneck by Program (Hours Demand)
Total equipment hours by program - dotted line shows average
📊 Advanced Analytics Dashboard
30
Programs
50%
Military
50%
Commercial
85.2%
Avg Yield
+34.8%
5Y Growth
458
Peak Units
14.5K
5Y Total
+6.2%
CAGR
⚡ Risk-Yield Matrix
Priority vs Performance (Bubble = Volume)
⚡ OEE Performance
Overall Equipment Effectiveness
79.2%
Overall OEE
93.2%
Availability
87.1%
Performance
97.7%
Quality
🔧 PM Schedule Compliance
Preventive Maintenance Status
On-Time
373
Early
683
Late
540
Scheduled
1670
49.9%
Compliance
$0.43M
Total Cost
1,080
Total PMs
📐 Calibration & Reliability
Instrument Status & MTBF Metrics
PASS Rate
77.3%
FAIL/Recal
22.7%
Avg MTBF
908 hrs
Availability
95.7%
147
↑ Improving
172
→ Stable
161
↓ Declining
📊 Demand Forecast Analysis
Program Demand Projection (Units/Month)
21,497
Total Units
358
Avg/Month
419
Peak Month
30
Programs
+8.2%
YoY Growth
⚠️ Risk Assessment Matrix
Equipment Risk Scores & Actions
22
Critical
19
Monitor
17
Preventive
14
OK
🔬 Performance Intelligence Matrix
Multi-Dimensional Equipment Analysis (Cycle Time × Utilization × Capacity)
Optimal
Watch
Critical
Bubble Size = Capacity
18%
Avg Efficiency
3,700
Total WPH
Flight Con
Top Bottleneck
87%
Fleet OEE
📊 Capacity Waterfall
Theoretical → Effective Capacity Loss Analysis
Theoretical
Avail Loss
Perf Loss
Effective
53K
Theoretical Hrs
8K
Total Losses
46K
Effective Hrs
🎯 Fleet Command
Real-Time Equipment Status
LIVE
3
Critical
17
Warning
0
Healthy
⏱️ Cycle Time Intelligence
Processing Speed Distribution & Variance
Fastest
Fleet Range
Slowest
0.1h
Avg: 0.7h
1.2h
0.1h
Min
0.7h
Avg
1.2h
Max
0.3h
Std Dev
📈 Throughput Performance Center
Effective vs Theoretical WPH with Availability Impact
Effective
Theoretical
20
Eq Types
95.6%
Avg Avail
78
Total Units
65%
Utilization
5%
Gap
🔥 Utilization Heat Map
Equipment Load Distribution Analysis
>90%
80-90%
70-80%
<70%
3
>90%
12
80-90%
63.7%
Avg Util
0
<70%
🎯 Risk Distribution
Capacity Threshold Analysis
3
Critical
17
Warning
0
Watch
0
Healthy
📅 Capacity Forecast & Bottleneck Timeline
5-Year Equipment Risk Projection with Critical Path Analysis
100% Line
80% Line
⏰ Upcoming Bottlenecks
3 identified
⚡ Quick Actions
Recommended Interventions
CRITICAL
Add capacity to Flight Control System - 87% utilized
CRITICAL
Wiring Harness at 109.7% - Immediate action required
MONITOR
Ground Test approaching 80% threshold by Q3 2027
OPTIMIZE
Fuselage Assembly has 47% headroom - consider rebalancing
SCHEDULE
PM due for NDT Inspection Bay in 14 days
2
Critical
1
Monitor
1
Optimize
1
Schedule
⚙️ Equipment Master
| Equipment | Qty | Hrs/Day | Cycle Time | Util % | Avail % | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Airframe Assembly Station | 4 | 24h | 0.7237417751147655h | 🟢 47.2% | 98.7661111597971% | ✓ OK |
| Propulsion Integration Cell | 3 | 24h | 0.5046465253340187h | 🟢 10.0% | 97.5600984634947% | ✓ OK |
| Avionics Installation Bay | 5 | 24h | 0.6537048051375165h | 🟢 39.8% | 96.32183533248464% | ✓ OK |
| Sensor Integration Station | 4 | 24h | 0.7755897546520665h | 🟢 31.5% | 97.52701602616966% | ✓ OK |
| Wiring Harness Station | 5 | 24h | 0.8205366290009686h | 🔴 109.7% | 94.28514239506721% | ⚠️ Critical |
| Flight Control System | 3 | 24h | 0.8906092004888078h | 🔴 87.0% | 92.8044524013298% | ⚠️ Critical |
| Payload Integration Bay | 4 | 24h | 0.5350225350785331h | 🟢 36.2% | 95.27210431766125% | ✓ OK |
| Ground Control Link Station | 3 | 24h | 0.3841842741229051h | 🟢 13.9% | 92.88612572350164% | ✓ OK |
| Final Assembly Line | 2 | 24h | 0.3295446962964652h | 🟢 40.1% | 94.73323668516507% | ✓ OK |
| Flight Test Station | 2 | 24h | 0.5646462830278707h | 🟢 8.9% | 97.4991659654162% | ✓ OK |
| Quality Inspection Cell | 5 | 24h | 0.6974742891900755h | 🟢 44.9% | 98.5500066324473% | ✓ OK |
| Environmental Test Chamber | 2 | 24h | 0.605870925528649h | 🟢 20.4% | 96.88833313976363% | ✓ OK |
📋 Programs
| Program | Type | Tech | Demand | Yield % | Priority | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reaper-X1 | Standard | 408 | 90% | Medium | Active | |
| SkyWatch-M2 | Standard | 268 | 90% | Medium | Active | |
| AgriScan-C1 | Standard | 872 | 90% | High | Active | |
| DeliveryDrone-D1 | Standard | 1,348 | 90% | High | Active | |
| SurveyPro-S1 | Standard | 510 | 90% | Medium | Active | |
| Sentinel-T1 | Standard | 144 | 90% | Medium | Active | |
| CargoLift-C2 | Standard | 466 | 90% | Low | Active | |
| InspectBot-I1 | Standard | 1,604 | 90% | Low | Active | |
| BorderWatch-B1 | Standard | 355 | 90% | Critical | Active | |
| EmergencyResp-E1 | Standard | 402 | 90% | Low | Active | |
| TacticalEye-T2 | Standard | 282 | 90% | High | Active | |
| FarmHelper-F1 | Standard | 1,225 | 90% | High | Active | |
| CoastGuard-CG1 | Standard | 236 | 90% | Medium | Active | |
| MiningScout-M1 | Standard | 699 | 90% | High | Active | |
| SearchRescue-SR1 | Standard | 302 | 90% | Low | Active | |
| PipelineWatch-P1 | Standard | 961 | 90% | Critical | Active | |
| NavalRecon-N1 | Standard | 123 | 90% | Critical | Active | |
| LastMile-LM1 | Standard | 1,522 | 90% | High | Active | |
| ForestFire-FF1 | Standard | 279 | 90% | Medium | Active | |
| PowerLineInsp-PL1 | Standard | 1,097 | 90% | Low | Active |
📊 Recovery Margin Dashboard
●≥25%
●10-25%
●<10%
| Equipment | Trend | 2026 | 2027 | 2028 | 2029 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Airframe Assembly Station | Stable | 14% | 16% | 14% | 15% | 14% |
| Propulsion Integration Cell | Stable | 66% | 66% | 66% | 63% | 65% |
| Avionics Installation Bay | Green | 49% | 50% | 50% | 51% | 50% |
| Sensor Integration Station | Green | 45% | 43% | 43% | 45% | 44% |
| Wiring Harness Station | At Risk | -0% | 3% | 3% | 1% | 1% |
| Flight Control System | Declining | 0% | 2% | -2% | -6% | -1% |
| Payload Integration Bay | Stable | 68% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 67% |
| Ground Control Link Station | Stable | 77% | 76% | 79% | 76% | 77% |
| Final Assembly Line | Stable | 61% | 61% | 62% | 61% | 61% |
| Flight Test Station | Stable | 69% | 69% | 69% | 67% | 69% |
| Quality Inspection Cell | Green | 43% | 43% | 43% | 44% | 42% |
| Environmental Test Chamber | Stable | 31% | 30% | 30% | 29% | 29% |
🔴 Critical
2
⚠️ Warning
1
✅ Healthy
9
📊 Avg
43%
▶ Yearly Analysis
| Year | Capacity | Demand | Margin% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 4,608 | 1,587 | 3,021 | 65.6% |
| 2027 | 4,608 | 1,552 | 3,056 | 66.3% |
| 2028 | 4,608 | 1,551 | 3,057 | 66.3% |
| 2029 | 4,608 | 1,692 | 2,916 | 63.3% |
| 2030 | 4,608 | 1,673 | 2,935 | 63.7% |
| 2031 | 4,608 | 1,581 | 3,027 | 65.7% |
| 2032 | 4,608 | 1,667 | 2,941 | 63.8% |
| 2033 | 4,608 | 1,572 | 3,036 | 65.9% |
| 2034 | 4,608 | 1,600 | 3,008 | 65.3% |
| 2035 | 4,608 | 1,628 | 2,980 | 64.7% |
| 2036 | 4,608 | 1,549 | 3,059 | 66.4% |
| Overall | 50,688 | 17,652 | 33,036 | 65.2% |
▶ Info
• Equipment Qty: 3 machines
• Hrs/Wk per Machine: 40 hrs
• Max Equipment Capacity (100%): 480 hrs/mo
• Max Operational Capacity (80%): 384 hrs/mo
• Cycle Time: 0.5046465253340187 hrs
• Hrs/Wk per Machine: 40 hrs
• Max Equipment Capacity (100%): 480 hrs/mo
• Max Operational Capacity (80%): 384 hrs/mo
• Cycle Time: 0.5046465253340187 hrs
• Shift Schedule: 1 shift 9/80
• Hours/Week: 40 hrs
• Formula: Hrs/Wk × Qty × 4.16667
• Max Op Capacity calculated at 80% of Max Equipment Capacity
• Target Recovery Margin: ≥25%
• Hours/Week: 40 hrs
• Formula: Hrs/Wk × Qty × 4.16667
• Max Op Capacity calculated at 80% of Max Equipment Capacity
• Target Recovery Margin: ≥25%
Sufficient Recovery Margin. The Propulsion Integration Cell station has 65.2% overall margin, which is above the 25% target. Capacity is adequate to handle demand variability.
🔍 Bottleneck Analysis Summary
| Equipment | Demand | Capacity | Util% | ⚠️ 80% | 🔴 100% | Gap | Status | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight Control System | 1744 hrs | 1368 hrs | 🔴 98.9% | ⚠️ Feb 2026 (45 months total) | ✓ OK | -376 hrs | ⚠️ Critical | Add capacity soon |
| Wiring Harness Station | 3722 hrs | 3000 hrs | 🔴 95.8% | ⚠️ Jan 2026 (37 months total) | ✓ OK | -722 hrs | ⚠️ Critical | Add capacity soon |
| Airframe Assembly Station | 1341 hrs | 1248 hrs | 🟠 84.5% | ⚠️ Oct 2028 +1 more | ✓ OK | -93 hrs | ⚡ Warning | Plan capacity add |
| Environmental Test Chamber | 285 hrs | 320 hrs | 🟢 88.9% | ✓ Safe | ✓ OK | +35 hrs | ✓ OK | None |
| Quality Inspection Cell | 1591 hrs | 2200 hrs | 🟢 72.3% | ✓ Safe | ✓ OK | +609 hrs | ✓ OK | None |
| Sensor Integration Station | 885 hrs | 1248 hrs | 🟢 70.9% | ✓ Safe | ✓ OK | +363 hrs | ✓ OK | None |
| Avionics Installation Bay | 1381 hrs | 2200 hrs | 🟢 62.8% | ✓ Safe | ✓ OK | +819 hrs | ✓ OK | None |
| Final Assembly Line | 548 hrs | 1120 hrs | 🟢 48.9% | ✓ Safe | ✓ OK | +572 hrs | ✓ OK | None |
| Propulsion Integration Cell | 210 hrs | 480 hrs | 🟢 43.8% | ✓ Safe | ✓ OK | +270 hrs | ✓ OK | None |
| Payload Integration Bay | 992 hrs | 2400 hrs | 🟢 41.3% | ✓ Safe | ✓ OK | +1408 hrs | ✓ OK | None |
| Flight Test Station | 125 hrs | 320 hrs | 🟢 39.0% | ✓ Safe | ✓ OK | +195 hrs | ✓ OK | None |
| Ground Control Link Station | 279 hrs | 960 hrs | 🟢 29.1% | ✓ Safe | ✓ OK | +681 hrs | ✓ OK | None |